DoorDash has inconsistent messaging throughout its publicly posted Terms Of Service, Privacy Policy, known practices, contracts with Dashers, contracts with consumers, fee explanations, app versions, etc. DoorDash must provide to the consumer public, its Dashers, Investors, Shareholders, etc. clear, honest, accurate, updated Terms Of Service, practices, policies, protocols, etc. with consistency and without contradiction or assertion of willful disregard of responsibilities and laws such as Duty Of Care, The Children's Online Privacy Protection Act (COPPA), etc.

More complete and thorough vetting for Dashers during hiring process.

Clear and definitive guidelines for interactions between DoorDash and minors with regards to use of the app and services.

DoorDash does not adequately vet drivers. DoorDash hides behind the New York case mandating them to consider certain prospective candidates who may have a violation or criminal record. The arguing point is the NY ruling mandating DoorDash to hire prospective candidates that may have a criminal background is moot because that is not what Attorney General Letitia James of New York directed DoorDash to do. See Here. The ruling simply prohibits the automatic exclusion of candidates without a history of violent crimes, who may potentially be rehabilitated, or where a considerable amount of time exists between the offense of record and the application for employment without further repeated occurrence The ruling merely cites state laws where fair consideration must be given in cases such as these. See Here. DoorDash must stop relying on untrained Artificial Intelligence or other flawed software to make decisions and assign a dedicated team trained and qualified to make such determinations. While satisfying its mandate to make fair considerations for applicants of its service this will also prevent dangerous Dashers from appearing at the doorsteps of unsuspecting consumers who all too frequently become victims.

Clear and definitive explanations on how DoorDash keeps minors safe when users call on the services of DoorDash. DoorDash uses circular language in what appears to be an effort to confuse the public so there is no clear understanding on its policies and practices. DoorDash states in Section 10 of its Privacy Policy that the services “Aren't intended for individuals under the age of majority in the applicable jurisdictions which includes for clarification, that our services are not intended for individuals under the age of 18, therefore we do not knowingly process personal information from individuals under 18 years old.” DoorDash's statement is vague and it does not clearly state that it does not and will not serve minors. It's also a blatant lie. DoorDash does in fact, knowingly collect the information and photographs of children and that must stop. DoorDash knows children order from its service. DoorDash has done direct marketing to children. And at the same time DoorDash does not do anything to prevent minor children from using its services. DoorDash must implement a date of birth collection field in its app and reject attempts to join by minor children. DoorDash must stop collecting the data of minor children including an E-Mail address when a minor child joins and a photograph of a minor child when a Dasher drops off an order. DoorDash also does nothing to vet account holders so it has no way to be sure there aren't underage individuals with established and active accounts utilizing its service. Based on the Risk Assessment supplied by DoorDash in its own SEC filing DoorDash is aware of this. Based on the fact that DoorDash has implemented partial facial recognition in what appears to be an effort to silence public outcries for more proper vetting rather than face legal action again, DoorDash is aware that facial recognition exists. DoorDash could very easily implement facial recognition and make that standard practice when joining the service. DoorDash could easily implement such security site and app wide. But DoorDash would likely do itself a disservice by implementing facial recognition software because after wide and varying exposures such as data breaches, account rentals, thefts, scams, phishing, hacks, and third-party sale of user data DoorDash likely wouldn't be trusted enough to withstand such a request and would likely suffer significant abandonment by users therefore significantly reducing its revenue. DoorDash heavily markets to the Gen Z population. The Gen Z population is considered to be between the ages of 13 and 28. This generation was born between 1997 and 2012. DoorDash is aware there are users below the age of 18 using its service. DoorDash rather chooses to do nothing beyond playing word games.

Regulation on Dasher travel companions.

Implementation of in-app revenue streams so DoorDash isn't compelled to arbitrarily pilfer money from consumers and reallocate it to Dashers ultimately and essentially stealing from both sides in order to sustain itself.

Implementation of technology fixes covering a wide-ranging number or current system flaws that have, in the past, and will again lead to data breaches, intrusions, scamming, spamming, phishing, theft, etc.

Implementation of security fixes across the DoorDash's countless system flaws.

Oversight—Corporate Probation. Given DoorDash's enormous breadth of offenses, crimes, violations, negligence leading to death, shootings, rapes, bullying, data exposures, lies, etc. DoorDash should be governed under a corporate supervision that can work together with DoorDash to strengthen its processes and practices, adopt guidelines to govern itself as a law-abiding good corporate citizen, and establish and maintain the utmost safety and care of consumers, Dashers, and the general public.

Disclosures with regards to asking account holders for their personal banking information and cards.

Disclosures on with whom data is being stored, who sees the collected information, who can see the information, where data is stored and for how long, what type of software is storing the data, history of vault services and any subsequent Intrusion scorecards, what's done to verify and track those looking at data collected, point and purpose of data collection and what the system does with it. Is bank data, or any data, sold or traded.

Immediate disclosures on third-party partners and their intrusions, data breaches, etc if any.

Immediate disclosures on third-party API and associated intrusions, data breaches, etc if any.

Monthly, weekly, daily, year over year, total overall spend in the form of a statement with breakdowns of tip spending and where it was applied, additional fees breakdown, and any other cost associated itemized spending breakdown.

Disclosures on “Small Order Fees”.

Disclosures on “Surge Fees”.

Identification badges for all DoorDash Drivers that appear on the doorsteps of the general public.

Obtain and maintain General Liability Insurance and Insurance against third-party damage and exposure.

Clause in Terms Of Service where it is agreed by DoorDash Inc. that no personal orpersonally identifying data is to be sold, swapped, exchanged, or traded without consumer disclosure as to whom the third party may be and without consumer informed consent.